dc.contributor.advisor |
Peiris, TSG |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rajamohan, KR |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-02-27T22:00:17Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-02-27T22:00:17Z |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Rajamohan, K.R. (2014). Identification of district level prosperity indicators of Sri Lanka [Master's theses, University of Moratuwa]. Institutional Repository University of Moratuwa. http://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/14012 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/14012 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
There are several indicators to measure the economic development of a nation such as Gross Domestic product (GDP), Human Development Index (HDI) and Human Poverty Index (HPI) etc. In 2008 the Central Bank of Sri Lanka introduced an index to measure the provincial prosperity of Sri Lanka. The suitability ofthis indicator in measuring the provincial development is questioned by many critiques, due to various drawbacks. Further, this index cannot be used for district levels This study aims to suggest the Human Development Index (HDI) and Human Poverty Index (HPI) for the districts of Sri Lanka using the national level data and further this study aims to identify the weaknesses of the present Sri Lanka’s prosperity index (SLPI) and formulate a new refined prosperity index for districts in Sri Lanka. The HDI and HPI are estimated using the methodology proposed by the Human Development Report ofthe UNDP and the districts were ranked according to the estimated HDI and HPI values. The suitability of these indicators is verified by the variation of HDI and HPI between the districts in specific time periods. The new refined prosperity index was formulated by correcting the conceptual weaknesses in SLPI. New variables were included in the new refined index. These variables were statistically analyzed using principal component analysis and factor analysis. The research findings reveal that the HDI has several weaknesses in measuring the regional development. The weaknesses are the inappropriate estimation methodology ofHDI and the slowly changing nature of the variables included in the HDI. Another weakness is the low weight given to the GDP index of the HDI, which covers more aspects of development. The HPI shows significant variations throughout the time periods as well as between districts. This is due to the appropriate estimation methodology ofHPI and the suitability ofvariables included in the HPI to capture the multi-dimensional perspective of the poverty. Therefore, instead of HDI, the HPI could be used as an indicator ofregional poverty levels. The new refined index is a conceptually stronger index than the SLPI as it covers all aspects of prosperity and provides the sector performance of different districts. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Factor analysis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Human Development Index |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Human Poverty Index |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Principal component analysis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sri Lanka Prosperity Index |
en_US |
dc.title |
Identification of district level prosperity indicators of Sri Lanka |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis-Abstract |
en_US |
dc.identifier.faculty |
Engineering |
en_US |
dc.identifier.degree |
Master of Science in Operational Research |
en_US |
dc.identifier.department |
Department of Mathematics |
en_US |
dc.date.accept |
2014-03 |
|
dc.identifier.accno |
107079 |
en_US |