dc.description.abstract |
In the recent past, Government of Sri Lanka executed a large-scale reclamation project in Sri Lanka
to add a brand-new land of 267-hectare to the Capital, Colombo with strategy of converting
Colombo as a commercial hub of South Asia. For this project, 72 Million m3 of sea sand which
was dredged by Trailing Suction Hopper Dredgers at 10km off from shore of Colombo was placed
mainly by hydraulic methods at lower elevation while applying bulldozers at the top. This
reclamation material was noted as clean uniform sand and which was under loose to medium dense
condition prior to densification.
This sand fill was densified using two methods, namely dynamic compaction and vibro
compaction. Dynamic compaction, which is generally considered as one of the most economical
sand improving methods, was applied in all areas except vibration sensitive areas at the city end
and the areas where deep ground improvement was required for stability of earth retaining
structures.
Since settlement of subsoil in the seabed is not critical, the considered major geotechnical issues
were achieving of required bearing capacity, shear strength and avoiding possible liquefaction. To
sort out all geotechnical issues, sand densification was the only solution. Though there is a very
long history for dynamic and vibro compaction methods, still reclamation projects are not preplanned
to utilize the self-compaction achieves during sand placing very effectively, while designs
always follow a very conservative approach. Moreover, designs are carried out using pre-defined
energy criterions rather than considering existing fill material properties and its pre-compaction
condition. Thus, there was a paramount requirement to assess the dynamic and vibro compaction
methods for Sri Lankan fill materials and reclamation methods with the intention of optimization
of the above compaction methods. In order to optimize dynamic compaction method, the pre-and
post-compaction condition (by CPTs) was evaluated by crater depth, net volume changes,
influenced depth and related indices, which assess the degree of improvement based on applied
iv
energy. Similarly, densification by vibro compaction was evaluated with respect to the factor such
as point spacing, amperage and compaction holding time. In addition, effect such as age of the
compacted fill was considered for both dynamic and vibro compaction in this reclamation fill of
clean sand.
Finally, verification of densified ground by selecting CPTs at least compacted points with respect
to the compaction grids was assessed for both dynamic and vibro compaction to confirm the
optimization has no adverse effect on the final design.
Based on the finding of this research, fill material’s index properties of Sri Lankan sea sand were
determined while being noted that there is no hesitation for applicability of dynamic and vibro
compaction for densification. During the analysis it was suggested to modify some correlations
derived based on laboratory test data to achieve more realistic output for actual reclamation
condition. In addition, design of dynamic and vibro compaction by performance-based method
through trial compaction was discussed. |
en_US |