Institutional-Repository, University of Moratuwa.  

Comparison between the terms constructability and buildability : a systematic literature review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wimalaratne, PLI
dc.contributor.author Kulathunga, U
dc.contributor.author Gajendran, T
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-05T05:01:50Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-05T05:01:50Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/16631
dc.description.abstract Buildability deals with the optimal integration of construction expertise at various project stages to achieve the overall project goals. Incorporation of buildability improves the construction project performance in terms of its cost, quality, productivity, safety, and results early completion. Thus, having a sound understanding of buildability concept is paramount for finding solutions for transforming current practices towards successful project deliveries. The numerous past studies reviewing the concept of buildability in the past have highlighted the interchangeability of the terms “constructability” and “buildability”. However, in some studies, these two terms contradict rather than considered similar. Moreover, the application of the concept of buildability is widely discussed during the design phase while some studies recommend it to be applied in the construction phase. Thus, there is no clear consensus on the clarity of the key constructs of these terms or when to apply buildability. This paper aims to systematically review the application of the concepts “buildability” and “constructability” in the construction sector and compare the definitions to understand the key constructs and best phase of the construction project for its applicability. A structured literature review covering indexed publications from 2011-2021 was carried out to identify the existing literature. Following a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) technique, a total of 38 out of 162 research contributions have been considered for an in-depth analysis. The choice of interpretations, comments, statements, perspectives, and definitions used in 38 studies were examined. The study identified the key constructs of two terms and recommends applying buildability throughout the lifecycle of the project. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Buildability en_US
dc.subject Constructability
dc.subject Construction
dc.subject Systematic literature review
dc.title Comparison between the terms constructability and buildability : a systematic literature review en_US
dc.type Conference-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.faculty Architecture en_US
dc.identifier.department Department of Building Economics en_US
dc.identifier.year 2021 en_US
dc.identifier.conference World Construction Symposium - 2021 en_US
dc.identifier.place Sri Lanka en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos pp. 196-207 en_US
dc.identifier.proceeding 9th World Construction Symposium - 2021 en_US
dc.identifier.email indraniw@uom.lk en_US
dc.identifier.email ukulatunga@uom.lk en_US
dc.identifier.email thayaparan.gajendran@newcastle.edu.au en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2021.17 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • WCS - 2021 [49]
    Proceedings of The 9th World Construction Symposium 2021

Show simple item record