dc.contributor.author |
Herath, HMOK |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sivakumar, T |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Gunaruwan, TL |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-04-07T03:30:38Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-04-07T03:30:38Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Herath, H.M.O.K., & Sivakumar, T. (2020). Use of deep learning as an alternative to manual counts in Sri Lanka [Abstract]. In T.L. Gunaruwan (Ed.), Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Research for Transport and Logistics Industry 2020 (p. 22). Sri Lanka Society of Transport and Logistics. https://slstl.lk/r4tli-2020/ |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/17581 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Maintaining a count of vehicles on roads by vehicle category is important for purposes of
traffic monitoring, analysis and prediction. To overcome disadvantages in manual traffic
counts, this study focuses on computer vision-based deep learning methods of counting
vehicles using videos. This study aims to (1) identify the best camera orientation for
improved accuracy and to (2) compare the accuracy of classified vehicle counts based on
deep learning- with manual counts at site and actual counts in laboratory using video
playback methods. It does so to examine the possibility of automating the classified vehicle
counts (CVC) which are currently performed manually in Sri Lanka. While manual
classified vehicle counts were collected at site, these were also captured on video for the
purposes of this study. This was done under different camera orientations (angle projections)
using a mobile phone with a 1080p@30fps inbuilt camera. A new deep neural network
(DNN) was trained to classify vehicles using a limited dataset, and OpenCV vehicle
detection with SSD Mobile Net API was used for deep learning vehicle counting. According
to the study, the best camera angle orientation for detecting vehicles is achieved by placing
the camera directly opposite to vehicular movement and at a horizontal inclination of 25°
(β= 0° and α = 25°). At this orientation, the highest accuracy of 76.5% was achieved. The
study found that both manual and deep learning methods result in error; former due to human
error and the latter due to limited training and computation power. However, even with
limited data training, deep learning was only 7% less accurate than manual counting, This
study observed that the alternative method (deep learning) was a cost-effective solution in
terms of human resources, operational difficulties, less pedestrian and vehicle distractions
etc. The primary video data collection contains all vehicle types, but this study was limited
to only two classes of vehicles: namely cars and motorbikes. Future studies will be done in
different locations to generalize initial research. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sri Lanka Society of Transport and Logistics |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
https://slstl.lk/r4tli-2020/ |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vehicle detection |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Camera orientation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Deep learning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Video traffic counting |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Manual vehicle counting |
en_US |
dc.title |
Use of deep learning as an alternative to manual counts in Sri Lanka |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference-Abstract |
en_US |
dc.identifier.faculty |
Engineering |
en_US |
dc.identifier.department |
Department of Transport and Logistics Management |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2020 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.conference |
5th International Conference on Research for Transport and Logistics Industry 2020 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.place |
Colombo |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
p. 22 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.proceeding |
Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Research for Transport and Logistics Industry 2020 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.email |
oshadhik@uom.lk |
en_US |
dc.identifier.email |
tsivakumar@uom.lk |
en_US |