Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wijekoon, WMISK
dc.contributor.author Mampearachchi, WK
dc.contributor.editor Pasindu, HR
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-09T10:36:25Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-09T10:36:25Z
dc.date.issued 2012-07
dc.identifier.citation ********************** en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/18243
dc.description.abstract When planning and design a highway. Assessment of sub grade shear strength is very important General practice adapts to measure the sub grade strength is called California Bearing Ratio (CBR). Standard CBR laboratory method testing requires sampling transport of soil to laboratory and then takes at least four day period for necessary testing procedures. Field CBR method is also time consuming method. Due to these reasons Dynamic Cone Panetrometer (DCP) is used and then correlated the DCP reading to a C.B.R value for design evaluation The significant advantages of the DCP are that it is a low cost, robust apparatus that is quick and simple to use. Very little damage is done to the pavement being tested (effectively nondestructive) and very useful information is obtained. One of the major advantages of the test is that the pavement is tested in the condition at which it performs. The simplicity of the test allows repeated testing to minimize errors and also to account for temporal effects. It should be noted that there are inherent inaccuracies in most CBR test results and these coupled with the material dependency of the DCP results make the DCP interpretation a very good indicator, but it should never be used as an absolute indicator of the in situ CBR strength of a material in a pavement. However following factor will effect to change both field D.C.P and C.B.R; (1) Field Moisture content (2) Plasticity Index (3) Instrumental and other man made errors and (4) Field Density These studies show that how far this DCP CBR relationship is viable .DCP had the most consistent results within the different layers. If there is any possibility to make good correlations between the DCP with the CBR. what are the other factors to be considered when preparing relationships between D.C.P and C.B.R. However, the results of this study indicated that the DCP can give more reliable result to the field CBR values, when PI is less than 10. When PI increases it is very difficult to predict because soil characteristics drastically change with soil properties. Therefore, some detail soil investigation is necessary even to predict the design CBR at the particular locations. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa. en_US
dc.relation.uri https://uom.lk/sites/default/files/civil/files/TRF%20book%202012%20-e-copy_0.pdf en_US
dc.subject C.B.R.
dc.subject D.C.P.
dc.title Relationships between c.b.r and d.c.p testing for different soil types en_US
dc.type Conference-Abstract en_US
dc.identifier.faculty Engineering en_US
dc.identifier.department Department of Civil Engineering en_US
dc.identifier.year 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.conference Transport Research Forum 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.place Colombo en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos p. 15 en_US
dc.identifier.proceeding Proceedings of the Transport Research Forum 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.email wasanthak@uom.lk en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record