Abstract:
Walking from origins to transit stops, transferring between transit lines and walking from transit stops
to destinations—all add to the burden of transit travel. Transfer, in particular, has been shown to
produce an additional penalty that is independent of time that it takes to transfer. Riders usually have a
negative perception of transfer because of the inconvenience which can be termed as "transfer
penalty". This transfer penalty is composed of several components: penalties due to walking while
transferring, due to waiting for the connecting vehicle, extra cost and uncertainty. Some of these
attributes of the transfer are often lacking in most of the existing literature. Understanding what
impacts the transfer penalty and the contribution of each component can have significant implications
for a transit authority, helping to identify which types of system improvement can most cost-effectively
improve transfers, and thus attract more passengers. Such an understanding should also lead to
potential improvements in ridership forecasting models.
This paper describes an investigation of the impact of transfer on transit mode choice by decomposing
the transfer penalty into transfer walking distance and transfer waiting time. The approach is to
consider alternative utility functions with different representations of the transfer component and subcomponents,
including piecewise-linearand separated formsforthe sensitivity parameter.
The empirical data used were obtained in stated preference experiments of transit mode choice
comparing LRT and bus. Alternatives were described by specifying the amounts of time spent on
vehicle, access, transfer and egress walk distances, fare, and transfer wait time. Indications of socioeconomic
characteristics and level of experience of transit use were also collected. A total of
approximately 452 interviews were collected in April of 2010. These were used to estimate the
parameter values for a range of different utility functions in logit models representing choice behavior.
The Jack-knife estimation procedure was used to correct for the repeated measurements.
The results indicate, among other things, that a transfer is equivalent to about 25 minutes of ride time,
that walking at transfer is more onerous than waiting at transfer, that 'per minute' sensitivity to transfer
wait time goes down as time goes up, that transfer becomes more onerous for aged people, for female
and for new users. Some of these findings are novel while others are consistent with work done
previously, and these findings have some implicationsfor both theory and practice.
