Institutional-Repository, University of Moratuwa.  

Evaluating community participation effectiveness in landscape architectural design and planning: with special reference to passaiyoor and rasavinthottam parks, Jaffna

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mallikarachchi, CD
dc.contributor.author Ekanayake, M
dc.contributor.editor Dayaratne, R
dc.contributor.editor Wijesundara, J
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-04T08:22:58Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-04T08:22:58Z
dc.date.issued 2023-04
dc.identifier.citation ** en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/21898
dc.description.abstract The majority of Sri Lankan context projects were planned and developed less prioritizing the community's actual needs. As a result of this top-down approach, when it comes to execution, there are certain disagreements between the government and the community. Many contemporary planning theorists acknowledge that public participation in the planning process can produce or create credibility, trust, and commitment. Even though a fairly modest number of landscape architectural projects have been carried out in Sri Lanka incorporating community participation, the effective integration of such data into public landscape design and development is yet to be explored. Therefore, this paper investigates the effectiveness of community participation in the design and planning process of Passaiyoor Park and Rasavinthottam Park in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. The methods of data collection include interviews, questionnaires, documents, and project reports. The effectiveness of public participation was evaluated by a toolkit of indicators derived from the literature. (indicators such as Administration, Information, Objectives, Stage, Targeting, Technique, Legitimacy, Common values, Fairness and equality, Equal power, and responsible leadership). The research outcomes were able to portray that the overall satisfaction level of the community participation process is 75% in Rasavinthottam Park and 77% in Passaiyoor Park, while the overall satisfaction level about the project outcome is 45% in Rasavinthottam Park and 22% in Passaiyoor Park. In fact, evidence that the execution of the community’s vision in the real ground seems to be lacking. Therefore, without putting pre-initiated projects (by the government) into action, identify the problems that are most relevant to the public and pay attention to engage the community early and throughout the process, not only for one stage, and make sure the process is transparent to all the community and the outcome of the project is their real need. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Centre for Cities & Department of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Community participation en_US
dc.subject Landscape design and planning en_US
dc.subject Communities’ need en_US
dc.subject Effectiveness indicators en_US
dc.subject Effectiveness of community participation en_US
dc.title Evaluating community participation effectiveness in landscape architectural design and planning: with special reference to passaiyoor and rasavinthottam parks, Jaffna en_US
dc.type Conference-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.faculty Architecture en_US
dc.identifier.department Department of Architecture en_US
dc.identifier.year 2023 en_US
dc.identifier.conference 9th International Urban Design Conference on Cities, People and Places ICCPP- 2023 en_US
dc.identifier.place Colombo, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos pp. 59-76 en_US
dc.identifier.proceeding Proceedings of the International Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- ICCPP-2023 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record