Abstract:
Growing environmental concern, which had arisen due to bitter experiences from the development
projects of the past, now require public involvement to ensure that the best option is implemented. This
includes an evaluation of the environmental impact assessment reports by the environmental authorities
prior to the grant of clearance to proceed. In Sri Lanka the environmental legislation was enacted in the
year 1980 and the present era could be considered the transition from 'proponent' driven development to
'proponent with p ublic' driven development. Since the government is interested in achieving its
dtNelopment objectives withoul undue delays, it is necessary for the projects to obtain environmenlal
clearance at the earliest. However. it is often noted that there is a tendency to sideline the environmental
aspects of projects citing the urgency of the government. The environmental authorities identify this as
deficiencies in the EIAR In the p resent day contest it is necessary for the EIA evaluators to extend more
efforts than expected imtil the proponents are matured enough to account for environmental concerns. The
present work of Upper Kotmale Hydropower Project (UKHP) in Sri Lanka presenJs an evaluation of the
key rupects of the EIAR and the efforts taken in the above direction.
